Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
116
Highlights
26
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Anker Prime 67W:
116 Highlights & 26 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
We break down the specs so you can decide without confusion.
What sets Anker 735 Nano 2 apart from Anker Prime 67W? This chargers face-off compares specs like usb-c ports, cable length, width & weight and beyond.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 2 points higher
Anker 735 Nano 2 vs Anker Prime 67W: Which GaN Charger Packs More Punch for Your Devices?
When it comes to reliable, high-efficiency chargers for laptops, tablets, and smartphones, both the Anker 735 Nano 2 and the Anker Prime 67W are popular choices aimed at users new to GaN (Gallium Nitride) technology, focusing on indoor use with strong safety features. Both devices sport a trio of ports (two USB-C and one USB-A), universal compatibility for a range of devices, and boast multi-layer safety redundancy systems complete with fire protection and thermal fail-safe mechanisms. They are designed with premium manufacturing quality standards, including polycarbonate housings and medium scratch resistance, ensuring dependable daily use. While their core functionalities are similar, subtle yet important differences lie in power output, construction materials, and charging technologies that may sway your decision.
Compact Champion: The Anker 735 Nano 2's Blend of Portability and Safety
The Anker 735 Nano 2 stands out for its compact travel-friendly size, weighing just 0.31 lbs and measuring 1.8 inches in height, making it an excellent companion for frequent travelers prioritizing lightweight gear. This charger supports a generous maximum output power of 65W and stable fixed power distribution, offering predictable energy delivery to connected gadgets.
Innovatively, it handles voltages up to 20V, optimizing device charging efficiency. Safety is also tightly assured with an instant protection response mechanism complemented by a respectable drop resistance rating of 3, reinforcing its reliability under real-world handling. Thermal performance is solid, too, with a defined throttling threshold of 176°F, ensuring stable operation without overheating.
From a materials perspective, the Nano 2's durable yet lightweight plastic-polycarbonate housing incorporates heat-resistant materials, balancing portability with resilience. Users seeking premium quality at a wallet-friendly price point ($39.99 at amazon.com) find that this charger ticks numerous boxes with robust safety and consistent performance.
Prime Power: Anker Prime 67W Combines Strength and Smart Fast Charging.
The Anker Prime 67W positions itself as a slightly more powerful and advanced option, boasting a peak and maximum output of 67W. While it reports a lower output voltage at 5V, this likely reflects its use of PPS (Programmable Power Supply) technology, which dynamically adjusts voltage and current in real time to maximize fast charging speed and efficiency. This dynamic power distribution method allows for more flexible and optimized delivery depending on the connected device's needs.
Physically, this charger is crafted with a combination of plastic, polycarbonate, and a significant metal-aluminum component in its housing. Though heavier at 0.38 lbs and narrower in width (1.57 inches), it brings enhanced structural durability that can appeal to users frequently on the move seeking a tough, premium-feeling charger. Its pocket-sized format makes it quite portable despite the added weight.
Safety standards remain high, leveraging multi-layer redundancy and fire protection akin to the Nano 2, with thermal fail-safe modes ensuring no compromise on reliability. The warranty strengthens its appeal with an explicit two-year coverage, offering peace of mind for longer-term ownership. Priced moderately higher, it can be found for about $49.99 at Amazon.com.
Quick Take
The Anker 735 Nano 2 excels in delivering solid, consistent 65W charging in a lightweight, compact form; perfect for budget-conscious buyers who value reliability and safety. Meanwhile, the Anker Prime 67W shines with its dynamic fast charging via PPS, a robust metal-and-plastic build, and a bit more raw power output, appealing to those ready to invest a little extra for cutting-edge convenience and durability.
Bottom Line
Both chargers come with excellent build quality, efficient GaN technology, and user-friendly features suitable for beginners and frequent travelers. The Nano 2 is a prime option if you prefer a lighter, more budget-friendly charger with stable output and safety specs you can count on. On the other hand, the Prime 67W is the charger to pick if you're after a bit more power with smart fast charging capabilities and a premium build, justifying its higher price tag for users who want the best balance of performance and durability.
Verdict
Winner: Anker Prime 67W - Offers enhanced power output, dynamic PPS fast charging, and a premium metal-inclusive design that caters to power users seeking the latest technology and durability.
Runner-up: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Excels in lightweight portability, reliable fixed power delivery, and strong safety features, making it a cost-effective and dependable choice for everyday users.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
We dove deep into Anker 735 Nano 2 vs Anker Prime 67W — every major spec, performance test, and design callout is here to help you pick the right charger.
Anker 735 Nano 2 utilizes GaN charging technology, whereas Anker Prime 67W uses GaN along with Fast Charging and PPS technologies, offering potentially faster and more versatile charging.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
75
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Wearable, Accessory
Anker Prime 67W
Compatible with multiple device categories including smartphone, tablet, laptop, wearable, and accessories, making it versatile for various charging needs.
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Desktop
67
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
Anker Prime 67W
Designed for wall-mounted installation, saving desk space and improving convenience.
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
12 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
68
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
70
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Anker 735 Nano 2
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Anker 735
66
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Anker Prime Wall Charger
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 735 Nano 2 is Anker 735 while for Anker Prime 67W it is Anker Prime Wall Charger, so the names reflect their specific models.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
37
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Global
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
US, EU, UK
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Ultra-Compact
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
The Output Voltage is 20 Volts for Anker 735 Nano 2, but only 5 Volts for Anker Prime 67W, indicating different voltage standards possibly suited for different device types.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Output Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Output voltage sticks out to me since the 735 Nano 2 runs at 20 volts while the Prime does only 5 volts so for quick charging some laptops the 735 Nano 2 might have an edge.
Anker 735 Nano 2 has a Maximum Output Power of 65 Watts, while Anker Prime 67W offers slightly more power at 67 Watts, beneficial for demanding devices.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The max output power on the 735 Nano 2 is solid at 65 watts but the Prime has a bit more at 67 watts which kinda makes it better for heavier charging needs.
Both products handle peak power at 65 Watts for Anker 735 Nano 2 and 67 Watts for Anker Prime 67W, showing that the Prime model supports slightly higher peak performance.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
Anker Prime 67W
Input voltage is 100 V, suitable for use in regions or devices operating at this voltage.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
62.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
The input frequency is 50 Hz, a common standard frequency for AC power in many regions around the world.
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3.25
A
0Votes
3
A
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Output current is 3 A, supporting rapid charging for a variety of devices.
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.3 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.3
Watt
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker Prime 67W
Load regulation is rated as Excellent, ensuring the voltage output remains stable under varying loads, which is critical for device safety and charging efficiency.
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Advanced
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Advanced
Anker Prime 67W
Surge protection rating is advanced, offering robust defense against voltage spikes and electrical surges.
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Excellent
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Short Circuit Protection
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W include Short Circuit Protection, enhancing safety during use.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Performance
14
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
67
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
Anker Prime 67W
Maximum charging speed is 67 W, enabling fast charging suitable for a broad range of devices including laptops and smartphones.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method
How is power distributed?
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fixed
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Power Distribution Method
The Power Distribution Method differs with Anker 735 Nano 2 using Fixed distribution, while Anker Prime 67W employs Dynamic distribution, allowing more adaptable power allocation.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
72 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Anker Prime 67W
Throttling behavior is gradual, which means charging speed will reduce smoothly as the battery nears full capacity to protect battery health.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
Anker Prime 67W
Charging speed is ultra-fast, helping reduce device charging time significantly.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat Management Efficiency
How efficient is heat management?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
vs
Heat Management Efficiency
Both chargers have High Heat Management Efficiency, providing effective thermal control during operation.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Consistent
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is described as Consistent for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, ensuring reliable power delivery.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Simultaneous Device Charging
How many devices can be charged simultaneously?
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Yes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Simultaneous Device Charging
Anker 735 Nano 2 allows Simultaneous Device Charging, but Anker Prime 67W does not provide this feature, making the Nano 2 more versatile for multiple device use.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standby
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W have Idle Charging Behavior set to Standby, which helps in energy saving during inactivity.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
USB-C, USB-A
Anker Prime 67W
This charger supports both USB-C and USB-A connector types, enabling compatibility with a wide range of devices that use these common standards.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
3
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
3
Anker Prime 67W
Equipped with a total of 3 ports, enabling multiple device connection and charging simultaneously.
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Power
What is the wireless charging power?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs
Does it support interchangeable plugs?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Interchangeable Plugs
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker Prime 67W feature Interchangeable Plugs, limiting plug flexibility.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Front
57
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Auto
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 735 Nano 2 has a width of 2.6 inches, whereas Anker Prime 67W measures 1.57 inches wide, making the Prime model slimmer.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
1.0 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Height
What is the height of the charger?
1.8
inch
0Votes
1.97
inch
0Votes
vs
Height
Height for Anker 735 Nano 2 is 1.8 inches compared to 1.97 inches for Anker Prime 67W, so the Nano 2 is slightly shorter.
The vertical measurement of the charger from bottom to top.
In the battle of Height,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.2 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Height on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.15
inch
0Votes
3.5
inch
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
The depth measures 3.5 inch (8.89 cm), contributing to the charger's overall compact footprint.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2.4 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
3.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
77
Anker Prime 67W
1Votes
Pocket
vs
Travel Size Classification
Anker 735 Nano 2 is classified as Compact for travel size, while Anker Prime 67W is Pocket-sized, indicating a smaller, more portable design for the Prime model.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
22 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Travel Size Classification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker Prime 67W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
70
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Plastic, Polycarbonate, Metal, Aluminum
vs
Housing Material
Housing Material of Anker 735 Nano 2 consists of Plastic and Polycarbonate, while Anker Prime 67W includes Plastic, Polycarbonate, Metal, and Aluminum, indicating a more premium build for the Prime.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
The Material Sustainability Level is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, indicating similar environmental considerations in materials.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
87
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
V-0
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
How drop-resistant is the charger?
3
ft
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Drop Resistance
Anker 735 Nano 2 has a Drop Resistance of 3 feet, while this metric is unavailable for Anker Prime 67W, giving the Nano 2 a known advantage in drop protection.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
27 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Reinforced
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials
Does it use heat-resistant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W use Heat-Resistant Materials, enhancing durability and safety.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Matte
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
0
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is Instant for Anker 735 Nano 2 but unavailable for Anker Prime 67W, indicating the Nano 2 responds faster to safety issues.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Protection Response Time on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode is present in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, helping prevent overheating risks.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Premium
Anker Prime 67W
Safety certification level is premium, ensuring compliance with the highest industry standards for electrical safety.
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter
Is there a child safety shutter?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Child Safety Shutter
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker Prime 67W have a Child Safety Shutter, so safety for children around the devices is not enhanced by this feature.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, ensuring broad device support.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility is available on both chargers, allowing them to charge older device models effectively.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Standard
Which wireless charging standard is supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Laptop Charging
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W support Laptop Charging, making them suitable for larger devices.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Both products maintain Stable Sustained Load Temperature Stability, indicating efficient operation under load.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
-4–140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
67
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Heat Sink
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Passive
57
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Both chargers use Passive Thermal Dissipation Method, relying on passive cooling techniques.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Throttling Threshold
At what temperature does throttling occur?
176
°F
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Thermal Throttling Threshold
Thermal Throttling Threshold is 176°F for Anker 735 Nano 2 but unavailable for Anker Prime 67W, so only the Nano 2 has a specified temperature limit before throttling.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, suggesting efficient energy conversion.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, reflecting their ease of use and practicality.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation
What is the plug orientation?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Straight
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Straight
vs
Plug Orientation
Plug Orientation is Straight for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, standardizing plug connection style.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
72
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
LED, Sound, Vibration
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
77
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both chargers, indicating moderate durability against environmental factors.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, ensuring dependable operation over time.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level
What is the manufacturing quality level?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Premium
vs
Manufacturing Quality Level
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium for both chargers, indicating high build standards.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Rated Lifespan
How long is the rated lifespan?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Long
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Long
vs
Rated Lifespan
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W have a Long Rated Lifespan, suggesting lasting product reliability.
Expected operational lifespan of the charger under normal usage conditions.
In the battle of Rated Lifespan,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Rated Lifespan on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
higher
38 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features are present in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, making them energy-conscious choices.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
vs
Energy Efficiency Rating
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both chargers, which means both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W perform efficiently.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category
What is the carbon footprint category?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
47
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Carbon Footprint Category
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, showing moderate environmental impact.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
vs
Eco Mode
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker Prime 67W feature an Eco Mode, possibly impacting energy-saving capabilities.
Reduces power consumption when full charging is not required.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating
How much power is lost during operation?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
97
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Low
vs
Power Loss Rating
Power Loss Rating is Low for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, minimizing wasted energy during charging.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker Prime 67W
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker Prime 67W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
60
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Email, Chat, Online Portal
vs
Support Channels
Both chargers support Email, Chat, and Online Portal customer support channels, ensuring similar support accessibility.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Business Hours
17
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, limiting assistance to standard operating times.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
What is the replacement policy?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standard Returns
27
Anker Prime 67W
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Replacement Policy is Standard Returns for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker Prime 67W, facilitating straightforward product returns.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker Prime 67W ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker Prime 67W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
