Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
120
Highlights
43
Differences
8
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Anker PowerPort III 100W:
120 Highlights & 43 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Learn what makes each charger unique and pick the one that matches your charging style.
Choosing the better charger? This comparison shows Anker 735 Nano 2 vs Anker PowerPort III 100W side by side — from usb-c ports, wireless charging power, interchangeable plugs & height to what users love.
Plug Insertion Cycles: High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
with 1 points higher
Anker 735 Nano 2 vs. Anker PowerPort III 100W: A Tailored Comparison for Everyday Charging Needs
When choosing a compact charger for your indoor charging setup, the Anker 735 Nano 2 and the Anker PowerPort III 100W stand out as reliable contenders designed for beginner users. Both chargers feature advanced GaN or fast charging technology, delivering consistent power through multiple USB-C and USB-A ports. Although they share portability, high build quality, and safety-centric designs, the fundamental distinction lies in their maximum output power and power distribution approach. The 735 Nano 2 peaks at a solid 65W maximum output power with a fixed power split, ideal for moderate charging demands, whereas the PowerPort III 100W pushes the envelope with a hefty 100W peak power and dynamic power distribution that suits heavier workloads and simultaneous multi-device charging.
Why the Anker 735 Nano 2 Shines for Everyday Users
The Anker 735 Nano 2 brings a thoughtfully balanced feature set for those who need safe, steady charging without the bulk of high-wattage power bricks. Its fixed power distribution ensures a consistent and reliable delivery to devices, minimizing complexity in power sharing when multiple devices charge concurrently. With two USB-C ports and one USB-A port, users can conveniently connect smartphones, tablets, or mid-range laptops simultaneously.
In terms of safety and thermal control, the Nano 2 employs a multi-layer safety architecture with instant protection response, complemented by a thermal throttling threshold rated at 176°F. This ensures the charger remains cool and stable under sustained loads while protecting your devices. Additionally, the charger is lightweight at 0.31 lbs and compact in size, making it easy to carry for travel.
Its housing is made of plastic and polycarbonate, ensuring medium-level material sustainability while offering decent drop resistance of 3, balancing durability with a good environmental footprint. Moreover, the charger supports backward compatibility for older devices, enhancing versatility for mixed-device households. Its premium manufacturing quality and long-lasting lifespan provide extra reassurance for everyday users.
Power and Flexibility: The Anker PowerPort III 100W Advantage
For those who demand higher power output and smarter management of multiple devices, the Anker PowerPort III 100W redefines fast charging at home or office. Delivering a robust 100W maximum output power, it can comfortably supply energy-intensive laptops and gadgets. This charger features a dynamic power distribution method, automatically allocating power between its two USB-C ports to optimize charging efficiency when powering multiple devices simultaneously.
The PowerPort III also shines in its advanced safety and thermal safeguards, including fast protection response and a higher thermal throttling threshold of 194°F, enabling sustained high-power operation without frequent throttling. This thermal resilience makes it a solid choice for users regularly charging multiple high-drain devices.
While slightly heavier at 0.331 lbs and marginally wider, its design remains travel-friendly and durable, boasting an improved drop resistance rating of 4. Though it has a lower material sustainability level compared to the Nano 2, the PowerPort III compensates with premium manufacturing consistency and a long service life.
One trade-off is its lack of backward compatibility, which may slightly lessen its seamless integration with older devices. Still, its universal multi-brand compatibility and support for tablet and laptop charging make it an all-around powerhouse. Overall, its robust energy input of 3 amps reflects its readiness for heavy load management.
Quick Take
The Anker 735 Nano 2 scores high with its lightweight, consistent charging, and extra safety features, making it ideal for users with moderate power needs and a travel-friendly design. On the other hand, the Anker PowerPort III 100W excels with stronger peak power output and dynamic distribution, offering an edge for charging laptops and multiple devices at once without compromising stability or protection.
Bottom Line
If charging sheer power and flexibility are your priorities, choose the Anker PowerPort III 100W, as it delivers exceptional performance for intensive users. However, if you want a charger that is compact, safe, and efficient for everyday use with smartphones and mid-tier laptops, the Anker 735 Nano 2 is a commendable choice.
Verdict
Winner: Anker PowerPort III 100W - Best for maximum power output, dynamic charging, and sustained performance for power users.
Runner-up: Anker 735 Nano 2 - Ideal for lightweight, reliable, and safe charging for moderate needs and daily portability.
Side by side. The numbers. The features. No drama.
From feature sets to real-life wins and flaws, this chargers comparison between Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W helps you cut through the noise.
Anker 735 Nano 2 uses GaN charging technology, whereas Anker PowerPort III 100W uses Fast Charging technology, which may impact charging efficiency and device compatibility.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W are designed for Beginner user levels, making them suitable for entry-level users.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
46
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The charger uses a plug-in installation type, enabling easy setup and use with standard power outlets.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
76
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was this charger released?
73
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
2022
74
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
2022
vs
Release Year
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W were released in the year 2022, reflecting recent technology.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
68
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
69
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
Anker 735 Nano 2
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Compact
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The product has a compact form factor, making it easy to carry and suitable for travel or limited space environments.
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Anker 735
67
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 735 Nano 2 is Anker 735, while for Anker PowerPort III 100W it is Anker PowerPort III 100W, indicating different model identities.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
3 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
36
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Wall Charger
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
11 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Desktop
61
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Wall-Mounted,Desktop
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
6 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can this charger be used?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Indoor
36
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Indoor
vs
Usage Environment
The Usage Environment for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W is Indoor, meaning both products are intended primarily for indoor use.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Global
46
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
US
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Maximum Output Power of Anker 735 Nano 2 is 65 Watts, while Anker PowerPort III 100W offers a higher output of 100 Watts, favoring more demanding charging needs.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
35.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W both provide short circuit protection, enhancing user safety with this feature.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Peak Power Handling is 65 Watts for Anker 735 Nano 2 and 100 Watts for Anker PowerPort III 100W, indicating the latter can handle higher power surges.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
35.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
40
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Its minimum output power is 40 Watts, suitable for charging a wide range of devices including laptops and tablets.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
35.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Input voltage is 100 Volts, compatible with standard US power sockets.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Voltage
What is the output voltage?
20
Volt
0Votes
20
Volt
0Votes
vs
Output Voltage
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W have an Output Voltage of 20 Volts, ensuring similar voltage compatibility.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
20.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.3
Watt
0Votes
0.1
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Standby power consumption is only 0.1 Watt, reflecting energy efficiency when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
0.2 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
76
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Excellent
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
66
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Good
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Current regulation is good, which helps maintain a stable current output to avoid damaging connected devices.
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
71
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Good
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The load regulation performance is good, indicating stable voltage output under varying load conditions.
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Advanced
86
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Enhanced
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Surge protection rating is enhanced, which helps protect the charger and connected devices from sudden voltage spikes.
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Overcurrent protection is active, safeguarding connected devices from excessive current that could cause damage.
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Overvoltage protection helps guard devices against damage from voltage surges above normal operating levels.
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3.25
A
0Votes
5
A
0Votes
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
In the battle of Output Current,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1.8 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 735 Nano 2 supports simultaneous device charging, like Anker PowerPort III 100W, but the former is specified only as 'Yes' while the latter specifies charging two devices simultaneously, indicating possible differences in number of devices supported.
The maximum number of devices that can be charged at the same time.
In the battle of Simultaneous Device Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
46 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Simultaneous Device Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W have high Heat Management Efficiency, benefiting durability and safety.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency is consistent for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, promising reliable charging performance.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method
How is power distributed?
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fixed
86
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Dynamic
vs
Power Distribution Method
Anker 735 Nano 2 uses a fixed Power Distribution Method, while Anker PowerPort III 100W uses a dynamic one, which may offer more flexible power allocation.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
71 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Distribution Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
46
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Charging stability is rated stable, indicating consistent power delivery without interruptions or fluctuations.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Fast
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The charging speed is fast, enabling quicker charging than standard chargers and improving convenience.
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
29 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
100
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
35.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Intelligent power allocation ensures optimal distribution of power among connected devices to maximize efficiency and safety.
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
0
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
None
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Adaptive charging technology automatically adjusts charging parameters based on the connected device's needs for optimal performance.
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior
What happens after charging is complete?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standby
86
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Standby
vs
Idle Charging Behavior
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W enter Standby mode during Idle Charging Behavior, which can conserve energy.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Each of Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W provides 1 USB-A port, maintaining compatibility with older USB devices.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker PowerPort III 100W have Interchangeable Plugs, which may affect international use convenience.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
86
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
USB-C
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The primary connector type is USB-C, known for fast data transfer and high power delivery compatibility.
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Front
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Front
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Ports are located on the front of the charger for easy access.
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Port labeling is included, aiding users in identifying the correct ports quickly for their devices.
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Anker PowerPort III 100W
The port durability is rated high, which means the USB ports can withstand frequent plug/unplug cycles without degradation.
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Magnetic alignment is not implemented, meaning the charger does not use magnets to align connectors automatically.
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
How long is the charging cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
In the battle of Pass-Through Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
In the battle of Daisy-Chain,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Auto
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
3
16
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
2
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The 735 Nano 2 is slightly lighter so it's easier to carry around for travel purposes.
See more
Width
What is the width of the charger?
2.6
inch
0Votes
2.73
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
Anker 735 Nano 2 has a Width of 2.6 inches compared to 2.73 inches for Anker PowerPort III 100W, with the former being slightly narrower.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.15
inch
0Votes
2.72
inch
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Depth dimension is 2.72 inches (6.91 cm), contributing to the overall compact design.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1.6 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Profile Depth
How far does the plug stick out?
3.5
inch
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
Plug profile depth is 3.5 inches (8.9 centimeters), which impacts how much the charger extends from the wall outlet.
Depth of the plug profile when inserted into an outlet.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Profile Depth on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Thickness
How thick is the cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Compact
vs
Travel Size Classification
The Travel Size Classification for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W is Compact, supporting portability for travelers.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Housing Material for Anker 735 Nano 2 is Plastic and Polycarbonate, whereas Anker PowerPort III 100W uses only Plastic, possibly affecting durability.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Medium for Anker 735 Nano 2 and Low for Anker PowerPort III 100W, favoring the former in environmental impact.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
45 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Material Sustainability Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Drop Resistance
How drop-resistant is the charger?
3
ft
0Votes
4
ft
0Votes
vs
Drop Resistance
Anker 735 Nano 2 has a Drop Resistance of 3 feet, whereas Anker PowerPort III 100W offers a higher resistance at 4 feet, providing better drop protection.
Maximum drop height the charger can withstand without damage.
In the battle of Drop Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1.0 ft
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Drop Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
86
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
V‑0
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
In the battle of Fire-Retardant Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
21
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Plastic
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
24 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
0
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Standard
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Heat-Resistant Materials
Does it use heat-resistant materials?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W use Heat-Resistant Materials, enhancing safety during use.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
In the battle of Heat-Resistant Materials,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Textured
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
31 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
How scratch-resistant is it?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
36
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Scratch Resistance
Scratch Resistance is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, indicating similar surface durability.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
0
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
None
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W have a Multi-Layer Safety Redundancy Level, enhancing user protection.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W support Thermal Fail-Safe Mode, safeguarding against overheating.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
In the battle of Thermal Fail-Safe Mode,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time
How fast does protection activate?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Instant
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
1Votes
Fast
vs
Protection Response Time
Protection Response Time is Instant for Anker 735 Nano 2 and Fast for Anker PowerPort III 100W, with the former potentially offering slightly quicker safety responses.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
In the battle of Protection Response Time,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
14 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Protection Response Time,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The protection response time is faster on the PowerPort which seems safer for your devices.
See more
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection
Does it include fire protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Fire Protection
Fire Protection is present in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, contributing to device safety.
Built-in measures to reduce fire risk during electrical faults.
In the battle of Fire Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Child Safety Shutter
Is there a child safety shutter?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Child Safety Shutter
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker PowerPort III 100W have a Child Safety Shutter, which may be a consideration for families with children.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
In the battle of Anti-Spark Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
In the battle of Auto Shut-Off,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Tablet Charging is supported by both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, ensuring compatibility with tablets.
Indicates compatibility with tablets and similar devices.
In the battle of Tablet Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Tablet Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, allowing wide device support.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Laptop Charging
Can it charge laptops?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Laptop Charging
Laptop Charging is supported by both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, accommodating laptop users.
Indicates whether the charger can power laptops.
In the battle of Laptop Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Laptop Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
The Thermal Throttling Threshold is 176 °F for Anker 735 Nano 2 and higher at 194 °F for Anker PowerPort III 100W, indicating the latter can sustain higher temperatures before throttling.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
18.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Sustained Load Temperature Stability is Stable for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, which supports reliable operation under continuous use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
76
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
-4‑140°F
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
In the battle of Storage Temperature Range,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Passive
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method is Passive for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, meaning no active cooling systems are used.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Thermal Pads
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
9 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
0
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Medium
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
56
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
32‑104°F
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
In the battle of Operating Temperature Range,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat
How much energy is lost as heat?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Low
vs
Energy Loss as Heat
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, contributing to efficiency.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
LED Indicators are not present on either Anker 735 Nano 2 or Anker PowerPort III 100W, which may affect visual status feedback.
Presence of LED lights to show charging or power status.
In the battle of LED Indicators,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
LED Indicators on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Orientation
What is the plug orientation?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Straight
26
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Straight
vs
Plug Orientation
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W have Straight Plug Orientation, simplifying installation.
Orientation of the plug relative to the charger body.
In the battle of Plug Orientation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Orientation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
39 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Management
How is the cable managed?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
External
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Cable Management
Cable Management is External for Anker 735 Nano 2 but is not available for Anker PowerPort III 100W, suggesting the former offers more cable handling options.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
In the battle of One-Hand Operation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Friendly
Is it travel-friendly?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Travel Friendly
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W are Travel Friendly, supporting portable use.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
76
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience
How convenient is it for daily use?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
vs
Daily Use Convenience
Daily Use Convenience is rated High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, making them suitable for regular use.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, indicating similar environmental durability.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, reflecting high build standards.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Rated lifespan is long on both but the build quality feels a bit more premium on the PowerPort.
See more
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
In the battle of Long-Term Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures
How reliable is the charger over time?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
vs
Mean Time Between Failures
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, suggesting reliable performance.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Flex Cycles
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy & Efficiency Compliance
8
Energy Efficiency Rating
What is the energy efficiency rating?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
vs
Energy Efficiency Rating
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, favoring energy-conscious users.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category
What is the carbon footprint category?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
46
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Medium
vs
Carbon Footprint Category
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, reflecting similar environmental impact levels.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Saving Features
Does it have energy-saving features?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Energy Saving Features
Energy Saving Features are present on both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, helping reduce power consumption.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
In the battle of Energy Saving Features,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode
Does it support eco mode?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
vs
Eco Mode
Eco Mode is not available on either Anker 735 Nano 2 or Anker PowerPort III 100W, potentially missing power-saving options in this regard.
Reduces power consumption when full charging is not required.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating
How much power is lost during operation?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
96
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Low
vs
Power Loss Rating
Power Loss Rating is Low for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, denoting effective power usage.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker PowerPort III 100W
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Support Channels include Email, Chat, and Online Portal for Anker 735 Nano 2, while Anker PowerPort III 100W offers Email and Phone, indicating broader support accessibility for the former.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
17 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Business Hours
16
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability is during Business Hours for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W, ensuring limited hours of support accessibility.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty Length
How long is the warranty?
28
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
1,5 Year
21
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
1.5 Years
vs
Warranty Length
The Warranty Length for Anker 735 Nano 2 is 1,5 Year, whereas Anker PowerPort III 100W offers 1.5 Years, both providing comparable warranty coverage.
Duration of warranty coverage provided with the charger.
In the battle of Warranty Length,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
higher
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Warranty Length on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
What is the replacement policy?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standard Returns
26
Anker PowerPort III 100W
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker PowerPort III 100W follow Standard Returns for their Replacement Policy, standardizing customer recourse.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉
, delivering
lower
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker PowerPort III 100W ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Supermod
Moderator
Recaptor
0
Cartling
