Yep, we may get a tiny thank-you (read: commission) when you buy through
links on Gadgetspotr — not enough for a yacht, but enough to keep the lights (and
servers) on.
Learn more
83
Highlights
41
Differences
9
Reactions
0
Likes
Anker 735 Nano 2
vs
Anker 737 Prime:
83 Highlights & 41 Differences —
So, Which Charger Actually Works Better
Looking for a charger? Discover differences in power output, size, and safety features between the Anker 735 Nano 2 and 737 Prime.
Choosing the better charger? This comparison shows Anker 735 Nano 2 vs Anker 737 Prime side by side — from usb-c ports, interchangeable plugs, weight & housing material to what users love.
Anker 735 Nano 2 vs Anker 737 Prime: Which GaN Charger Reigns Supreme?
When it comes to charging your devices efficiently, Anker is a trusted name with its innovative GaN technology, which powers two standout models: the Anker 735 Nano 2 and the Anker 737 Prime. Both chargers cater primarily to beginners looking for reliable indoor solutions with multiple ports, including two USB-C and one USB-A, and each enables simultaneous device charging with consistent performance.
While they share this baseline, the 735 Nano 2 is geared for moderate power users with its 65W max output at a higher 20V output, ideal for standard laptops and tablets. Meanwhile, the 737 Prime steps up the game with a notable 120W maximum output but at a fixed 5V voltage, designed for power users who juggle multiple devices on the go. These distinctions extend further into thermal management, size, and warranty offerings, making for an insightful choice depending on your needs.
Distinctive Qualities of the Anker 735 Nano 2
The Anker 735 Nano 2 shines in several key areas that make it a compelling pick for those prioritizing quality and efficiency without breaking the bank. One of its standout points is the 65W max output power delivered consistently through a fixed power distribution method, supporting the simultaneous charging of two devices with stable output. The charger's design incorporates polycarbonate housing with heat-resistant materials, enhancing safety and durability. Its impressive thermal throttling threshold of 176°F means it can sustain heavy charging loads without overheating more quickly than many alternatives.
Plus, the Nano 2 supports broader universal compatibility, ensuring you can reliably power tablets, laptops, and more across different brands. Complementing its performance is a 1.5-year warranty paired with servicing options like email and chat support, aiming to deliver peace of mind to users on a budget. All these factors contribute to its reputation as a robust, versatile charger that balances power, safety, and price in one compact package.
Why the Anker 737 Prime Could Be Your Powerhouse Choice
The Anker 737 Prime stands as a high-capacity charger tailored to those who demand more from their charging gear. Its defining feature is the sizeable 120W maximum output; almost double that of the Nano 2, accommodating fast charging for larger laptops or multiple devices simultaneously. Thanks to its dynamic power distribution, it can effortlessly support three devices at once, an upgrade from the 735's two, making it ideal for tech-heavy travelers or multi-device users.
Though it runs at a lower 5V output voltage, its compact build makes up for it; the 1.26-inch height and 1.69-inch width contribute to a more travel-friendly profile despite being barely heavier than its counterpart. The 2-year warranty outshines the 735 Nano 2's shorter coverage, providing longer support. While it lacks the explicit thermal fail-safe mode and heat-resistant materials specified in the 735, it compensates with a faster protection response time and multi-layer safety features. Its limitations in universal compatibility might deter some. Still, for users centered on power and charging multiple devices quickly, the 737 Prime is a powerhouse that justifies its premium price ($73.27 at AliExpress).
Quick Take
Both the Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime bring solid GaN tech with consistent charging performance and robust safety redundancies, perfect for contemporary device users. The 735 Nano 2 wins on price, thermal resilience, and broad device compatibility, while the 737 Prime offers superior power output and the ability to charge more devices simultaneously, packaged in a slightly smaller form factor.
Bottom Line: Which One Suits You Best?
In essence, choose the Anker 735 Nano 2 if you value a well-rounded, budget-conscious charger with excellent heat management and universal brand support; an ideal companion for everyday users and travelers. On the other hand, if your priority is high wattage to power demanding devices or multiple gadgets at once, the Anker 737 Prime stands out with its 120W capacity and extra device port, perfect for power users ready to invest a bit more for efficiency and speed.
Verdict
Winner: Anker 735 Nano 2; a balanced, affordable charger excelling in thermal management, compatibility, and steady output for most users.
Runner-up: Anker 737 Prime; ideal for tech enthusiasts who demand peak power and simultaneous multi-device charging, but at a higher cost and narrower device versatility.
The User Level for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime is Beginner, making them equally suitable for users new to such devices.
Describes the technical experience level required to use the charger effectively.
In the battle of User Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
15 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Power Source
What is the power source?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
AC Outlet
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
AC Outlet
Anker 735 Nano 2
Power is sourced directly from an AC outlet, the standard electrical supply found in homes and offices, ensuring broad compatibility and ease of use.
Anker 737 Prime
Power is sourced from an AC Outlet, ideal for regular indoor use.
Defines where the charger draws its power from.
In the battle of Power Source,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Source on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Installation Type
How is the charger installed?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-In
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plug-In
Anker 735 Nano 2
Installation type is plug-in, indicating easy setup by directly connecting to a power outlet without additional wiring or mounting requirements.
Anker 737 Prime
This charger utilizes a Plug-In installation type, ensuring straightforward setup.
Describes how the charger is installed or connected.
In the battle of Installation Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Installation Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Charger Type
What type of charger is this?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Wall Charger
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Wall Charger
Anker 737 Prime
The device is categorized as a Wall Charger, making it convenient for stationary use.
Defines the primary charger category based on form and usage.
In the battle of Charger Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charger Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Intended Use
What is the intended use of this charger?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
28
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Home, Office, Travel
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is intended for use in home, office, and travel environments, showing versatility across common charging scenarios.
Describes where and how the charger is primarily intended to be used.
In the battle of Intended Use,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
47 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intended Use on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Certifications
What certifications does this charger have?
68
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
UL, CE, FCC, RoHS
70
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
FCC
Anker 735 Nano 2
This charger holds several important certifications—including UL, CE, FCC, and RoHS—that demonstrate compliance with safety, electromagnetic compatibility, and environmental standards.
Lists official safety, quality, and compliance certifications held by the charger.
In the battle of Certifications,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
2 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Certifications on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Product Form Factor
What is the product form factor?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Compact
Anker 737 Prime
The product form factor is Compact, which contributes to its portability.
Describes the overall physical form and size profile of the charger.
In the battle of Product Form Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Form Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Product Name
What is the product name?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Anker 735
66
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
vs
Product Name
The Product Name for Anker 735 Nano 2 is Anker 735, while for Anker 737 Prime it is Anker 737 Prime, indicating distinct model identities for buyers to consider.
Official product name used to identify the charger model.
In the battle of Product Name,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
4 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Product Name on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Technology
What charging technology does it use?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
GaN
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
GaN
vs
Charging Technology
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime utilize GaN Charging Technology, ensuring efficient and modern power delivery in both devices.
Indicates the core technology used to deliver power efficiently.
In the battle of Charging Technology,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Technology on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
59
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Smartphone, Tablet, Laptop, Accessory
Indicates the types of devices the charger can power.
In the battle of Device Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
26 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Compatibility Notes
Are compatibility notes clearly provided?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether additional compatibility limitations or requirements are clearly disclosed.
In the battle of Compatibility Notes,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Compatibility Notes on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Mounting Style
What is the mounting style?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Desktop
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Wall-Mounted
Indicates how the charger is physically positioned during use.
In the battle of Mounting Style,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mounting Style on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Usage Environment
Where can this charger be used?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Indoor
63
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Indoor, Travel
vs
Usage Environment
Anker 735 Nano 2 is designed for Indoor use only, whereas Anker 737 Prime supports both Indoor and Travel environments, offering more versatility for mobile users.
Specifies the environments where the charger is designed to operate.
In the battle of Usage Environment,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Usage Environment on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Release Year
What year was this charger released?
73
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
2022
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
2022
vs
Release Year
The Release Year for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime is 2022, so both products are from the same generation.
The year the charger model was first released to market.
In the battle of Release Year,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
28 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Release Year on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Regulatory Region
Which regulatory regions does it support?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Global
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Global
Indicates the regions where the charger meets regulatory standards.
In the battle of Regulatory Region,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Regulatory Region on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 735 Nano 2 operates at an Output Voltage of 20 Volts, whereas Anker 737 Prime outputs 5 Volts, highlighting different voltage standards for device compatibility.
The voltage supplied to connected devices during charging.
In the battle of Output Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
15.0 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Voltage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
The Peak Power Handling of Anker 735 Nano 2 is 65 Watts compared to 120 Watts for Anker 737 Prime, indicating superior performance capacity in the 737 Prime.
The maximum short-term power the charger can safely handle.
In the battle of Peak Power Handling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Peak Power Handling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Input Current
How much input current does it draw?
1.8
A
0Votes
1.9
A
0Votes
vs
Input Current
The Input Current is 1.8 Amperes for Anker 735 Nano 2 and slightly higher at 1.9 Amperes for Anker 737 Prime, reflecting a minor difference in current requirements.
The amount of current drawn from the power source during operation.
In the battle of Input Current,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
0.1 A
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Current on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Power Consumption
How much power is used on standby?
0.3
Watt
0Votes
0.23
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The standby power consumption is very low at 0.3 Watts, which helps reduce energy waste when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging a device.
Anker 737 Prime
Standby power consumption is only 0.23 W, which is efficient for energy saving.
Power consumed when the charger is plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Power Consumption,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
0.1 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Power Consumption on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Voltage Regulation
How good is the voltage regulation?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Excellent
65
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
Anker 735 Nano 2
Voltage regulation quality is excellent, ensuring stable voltage output to prevent damage to devices and maintain efficient charging.
Anker 737 Prime
The voltage regulation is rated as Good, providing stable output power.
Indicates how well output voltage remains stable under varying load conditions.
In the battle of Voltage Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Voltage Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Minimum Output Power
What is the minimum output power?
5
Watt
0Votes
22.5
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
The minimum output power is 5 Watts, suitable for reliably charging smaller devices or initiating charging processes with compatible equipment.
The lowest stable power output supported by the charger.
In the battle of Minimum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
17.5 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Minimum Output Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Input Voltage
What input voltage does it support?
100
Volt
0Votes
100
Volt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Input voltage rating of 100 Volts corresponds to the voltage level the charger can safely accept from the power source.
The voltage range required from the power source to operate safely.
In the battle of Input Voltage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
equal
100.00 Volt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Voltage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Power Efficiency
How efficient is the charger?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
Power efficiency is rated as High, leading to reduced electricity consumption.
Indicates how effectively input power is converted into usable output power.
In the battle of Power Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Power Factor
What is the power factor?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Anker 735 Nano 2
The power factor is high, indicating efficient use of electrical power, reducing wasted energy and improving charger performance.
Indicates how efficiently electrical power is drawn from the power source.
In the battle of Power Factor,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Factor on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Load Regulation
How good is the load regulation?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
Anker 737 Prime
Using Good load regulation ensures stable performance across different connected devices.
Measures output stability as load increases or decreases.
In the battle of Load Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
25 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Load Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Short Circuit Protection
Does it have short circuit protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
vs
Short Circuit Protection
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime include Short Circuit Protection, providing important safety features to protect connected devices.
Automatically shuts down power if a short circuit is detected.
In the battle of Short Circuit Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Short Circuit Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Overvoltage Protection
Does it prevent overvoltage?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
This charger is equipped with overvoltage protection, safeguarding devices from potential damage.
Protects devices from excessive voltage output.
In the battle of Overvoltage Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overvoltage Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Output Power
What is the maximum output power?
65
Watt
0Votes
120
Watt
1Votes
vs
Maximum Output Power
Anker 735 Nano 2 provides a Maximum Output Power of 65 Watts, while Anker 737 Prime offers a higher 120 Watts, catering to higher power needs in the latter.
The highest total power the charger can deliver to connected devices.
In the battle of Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Based on community votes for Maximum Output Power,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 737 Prime ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The max output power on the 737 Prime is really impressive with 120 watts while the 735 Nano 2 has just 65 watts so I'm leaning towards the 737 Prime.
See more
Input Frequency
What input frequency is supported?
50
Hz
0Votes
50
Hz
0Votes
The electrical frequency range the charger can accept.
In the battle of Input Frequency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
equal
50.00 Hz
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Input Frequency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Output Current
What is the output current?
3.25
A
0Votes
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The maximum current delivered to devices for charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Output Current on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Current Regulation
How good is the current regulation?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Good
55
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Good
Indicates how consistently current is controlled during charging.
In the battle of Current Regulation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Current Regulation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Ripple & Noise
How much ripple and noise is present?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Low
Indicates the level of electrical noise present in the output.
In the battle of Ripple & Noise,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ripple & Noise on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Surge Protection Rating
How strong is the surge protection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Advanced
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Enhanced
Indicates the strength of protection against voltage spikes.
In the battle of Surge Protection Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surge Protection Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Overcurrent Protection
Is overcurrent protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Prevents damage by limiting excessive current flow.
In the battle of Overcurrent Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overcurrent Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Power Distribution Method is Fixed in Anker 735 Nano 2, whereas Anker 737 Prime uses a Dynamic method, offering more flexible power allocation in the latter.
Describes how power is allocated across multiple ports.
In the battle of Power Distribution Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
70 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Power Distribution Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
0 votes,
less than
Anker 737 Prime ◉,
which got 1 votes.
The power distribution on the 737 Prime is dynamic which seems smarter than fixed on the 735 Nano 2 so I lean towards the 737 Prime for better device management.
I like how the 737 Prime can charge three devices simultaneously unlike the 735 Nano 2 that supports only two which definitely makes the 737 Prime my pick.
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime have High Heat Management Efficiency, which helps maintain safe operational temperatures.
Measures how effectively heat is managed during charging.
In the battle of Heat Management Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat Management Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Idle Charging Behavior is Standby for both the Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, ensuring minimal power consumption when inactive.
Describes behavior when a device is fully charged but still connected.
In the battle of Idle Charging Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Idle Charging Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Maximum Charging Speed
What is the maximum charging speed?
65
Watt
0Votes
120
Watt
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Maximum charging speed is 65 Watts, enabling rapid charging for compatible high-power devices such as laptops and tablets.
Anker 737 Prime
The maximum charging speed is rated at 120 W, allowing for rapid charging of devices.
The highest charging power delivered to a single device.
In the battle of Maximum Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
55.0 Watt
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maximum Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Throttling Behavior
How does the charger throttle performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Gradual
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Gradual
Anker 735 Nano 2
Throttling behavior is gradual, meaning the charger reduces power output progressively under thermal or system stress, protecting components without abrupt interruptions.
Anker 737 Prime
Throttling behavior is described as Gradual, which helps maintain device performance under load.
Describes how charging speed is reduced when limits are reached.
In the battle of Throttling Behavior,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Throttling Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Consistency
Is charging speed consistent?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Consistent
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Consistent
vs
Charging Consistency
Charging Consistency is rated as Consistent for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, ensuring reliable power delivery in each.
Indicates how evenly charging speed is maintained throughout a session.
In the battle of Charging Consistency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Consistency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Intelligent Power Allocation
Does it allocate power intelligently?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
The charger features intelligent power allocation, optimizing energy distribution during operation.
Automatically adjusts power delivery based on connected devices.
In the battle of Intelligent Power Allocation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Intelligent Power Allocation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Stability
How stable is the charging performance?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Stable
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger provides stable charging stability, ensuring consistent and reliable power flow to connected devices. Stable charging is crucial for prolonging device battery life and preventing unexpected power interruptions.
Reflects how consistent charging output remains over time.
In the battle of Charging Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Device Detection Accuracy
How accurate is device detection?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
Device detection accuracy is rated High, enhancing compatibility with various electronics.
Accuracy in identifying connected devices and their power needs.
In the battle of Device Detection Accuracy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Device Detection Accuracy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Charging Speed
What is the charging speed category?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Ultra-Fast
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Fast
Classifies overall charging speed based on supported power and protocols.
In the battle of Charging Speed,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
40 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Charging Speed on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Full Charge Time Estimate
How long does a full charge take?
10
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Fast depending on device
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Estimated time required to fully charge a typical device.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Full Charge Time Estimate on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Adaptive Charging
Does it support adaptive charging?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Adjusts charging patterns based on device needs and conditions.
In the battle of Adaptive Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Adaptive Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Startup Charging Delay
Is there a delay before charging starts?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Time taken before charging begins after a device is connected.
In the battle of Startup Charging Delay,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Startup Charging Delay on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Interchangeable Plugs are not available in either Anker 735 Nano 2 or Anker 737 Prime, so plug flexibility is limited.
Supports interchangeable plug heads for different regions.
In the battle of Interchangeable Plugs,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Interchangeable Plugs on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Each model includes 1 USB-A Port in Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, maintaining compatibility with older devices.
Number of traditional USB-A output ports.
In the battle of USB-A Ports,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB-A Ports on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Durability
How durable are the ports?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
The port durability is rated as High, suggesting it can withstand frequent usage.
Expected resistance of ports to wear from repeated use.
In the battle of Port Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Durability
How durable are the connectors?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Anker 737 Prime
The High connector durability indicates its ability to withstand wear and tear.
Durability of the connector interface itself.
In the battle of Connector Durability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Durability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging
Does it support wireless charging?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether the charger supports wireless charging.
In the battle of Wireless Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Power
What is the wireless charging power?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Maximum power delivered during wireless charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Power on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Connector Type
What connector types are supported?
70
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
USB-A, USB-C
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
USB‑A, USB‑C
Types of connectors supported by the charger.
In the battle of Connector Type,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Connector Type on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Detachable Cable
Is the cable detachable?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether the charging cable can be detached.
In the battle of Detachable Cable,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Detachable Cable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Length
How long is the charging cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Length of the included charging cable.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Length on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Pass-Through Charging
Does it support pass-through charging?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Allows the charger to power devices while itself being powered.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Pass-Through Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Placement
Where are the ports located?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Front
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Front
Location of charging ports on the charger body.
In the battle of Port Placement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
19 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Placement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Labeling
Are the ports labeled?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether ports are clearly labeled for identification.
In the battle of Port Labeling,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Labeling on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Magnetic Alignment
Does it support magnetic alignment?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Supports magnetic alignment for easier device placement.
In the battle of Magnetic Alignment,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Magnetic Alignment on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Daisy-Chain
Can it be daisy-chained?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Allows multiple chargers or devices to be linked together.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daisy-Chain on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Power Priority
How is port power priority handled?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Auto
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Auto
Determines how power priority is assigned among ports.
In the battle of Port Power Priority,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Power Priority on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Total Ports
How many total ports does the charger have?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
3
57
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
3
Total number of output ports available for charging devices.
In the battle of Total Ports,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
32 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Total Ports on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
The 737 Prime is way shorter in height at 1.26 inches making it more portable than the 735 Nano 2 which is 1.8 inches tall so I prefer the 737 Prime for travel.
See more
Depth
What is the depth of the charger?
1.15
inch
0Votes
3.15
inch
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
The depth of the charger is 3.15 inches, equating to roughly 8 cm, making it compact for travel.
The front-to-back measurement of the charger body.
In the battle of Depth,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
2.0 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Depth on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Width
What is the width of the charger?
2.6
inch
0Votes
1.69
inch
0Votes
vs
Width
The Width of Anker 735 Nano 2 is 2.6 inches, while Anker 737 Prime is narrower at 1.69 inches, which may affect handling and storage.
The horizontal measurement of the charger body from side to side.
In the battle of Width,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
0.9 inch
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Width on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Thickness
How thick is the cable?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Thickness of the charging cable, affecting durability and flexibility.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Thickness on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Travel Size Classification
Is this charger travel-sized?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Compact
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Compact
vs
Travel Size Classification
Travel Size Classification is Compact for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, making them convenient for travel.
Overall size category based on dimensions and portability.
In the battle of Travel Size Classification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Size Classification on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Anker 735 Nano 2 features a Housing Material of Plastic and Polycarbonate, while Anker 737 Prime uses Plastic only, potentially affecting durability and feel.
Primary material used for the outer charger casing.
In the battle of Housing Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Housing Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Material Sustainability Level is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, indicating comparable environmental considerations in materials.
Use of sustainable or environmentally friendly materials.
In the battle of Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Based on community votes for Material Sustainability Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 737 Prime ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Both chargers are medium on material sustainability level and honestly it doesn't sway me but if I had to choose I take the 735 Nano 2 since they are essentially the same here.
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Heat-Resistant Materials
Heat-Resistant Materials are present in Anker 735 Nano 2 but unavailable in Anker 737 Prime, suggesting better heat resistance in the 735 Nano 2.
Uses materials designed to withstand high temperatures safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Heat-Resistant Materials on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Fire-Retardant Rating
What is the fire-retardant rating?
85
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
V-0
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
Fire-retardant rating is V-0, the highest UL 94 standard, indicating materials used resist burning and self-extinguish quickly if ignited, enhancing user safety.
Fire safety rating of the charger materials.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire-Retardant Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Scratch Resistance
How scratch-resistant is it?
35
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
vs
Scratch Resistance
Scratch Resistance is Medium in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, offering moderate surface protection on each device.
Resistance of the surface to scratches and abrasions.
In the battle of Scratch Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Scratch Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Moisture Resistance
Is it resistant to moisture?
0
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
0
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
None
Anker 737 Prime
Moisture resistance is reported as None, which means care should be taken to avoid exposure to water.
Ability to withstand moisture exposure.
In the battle of Moisture Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Moisture Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Material
What material is the plug made of?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
40
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plastic, Metal
Material used for the plug prongs and structure.
In the battle of Plug Material,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
5 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Material on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Reinforcement
Are the ports reinforced?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Reinforced
0
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Standard
Indicates whether charging ports are reinforced for durability.
In the battle of Port Reinforcement,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
95 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Reinforcement on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Surface Finish
What is the surface finish?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Matte
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Textured
External surface finish affecting grip and aesthetics.
In the battle of Surface Finish,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Surface Finish on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Build Rigidity
How rigid is the charger build?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Solid
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Solid
Overall structural stiffness of the charger body.
In the battle of Build Rigidity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Build Rigidity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Protection Response Time is Instant in Anker 735 Nano 2 but Fast in Anker 737 Prime, highlighting a slightly quicker reaction in the 735 Nano 2 for safety events.
Time taken for protection systems to activate during a fault.
In the battle of Protection Response Time,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
16 score
measurement.
Based on community votes for Protection Response Time,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ earned
1 votes,
more than
Anker 737 Prime ◉,
which got 0 votes.
Protection response time is instant on 735 Nano 2 which sounds safer to me than the fast response on 737 Prime so I'm going with the 735 Nano 2 for peace of mind.
Neither Anker 735 Nano 2 nor Anker 737 Prime include a Child Safety Shutter, so caution is advised around children.
Prevents accidental insertion of objects into live ports.
In the battle of Child Safety Shutter,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Child Safety Shutter on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Both devices feature a Multi-Layer Safety Redundancy Level, enhancing overall user safety in Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime alike.
Indicates the number of safety systems working together.
In the battle of Safety Redundancy Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Redundancy Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode is present in Anker 735 Nano 2 but not available in Anker 737 Prime, indicating better thermal safety in the 735 Nano 2.
Emergency mode that safely disables charging during extreme heat.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Fail-Safe Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Temperature Monitoring
Is temperature actively monitored?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
Temperature monitoring is an available feature, enhancing performance reliability during usage.
Continuously monitors internal temperature during operation.
In the battle of Temperature Monitoring,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Temperature Monitoring on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Electrical Isolation
Is electrical isolation implemented?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
This model includes electrical isolation, which helps enhance safety.
Separates high-voltage and low-voltage components for safety.
In the battle of Electrical Isolation,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Electrical Isolation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
ESD Protection
Is ESD protection supported?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
This model offers ESD protection, helping guard against electrostatic discharge.
Shields the charger from electrostatic discharge damage.
In the battle of ESD Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
ESD Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Fault Detection
Can it detect electrical faults?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
This model includes fault detection, which helps prevent potential issues during operation.
Detects abnormal electrical conditions during operation.
In the battle of Fault Detection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fault Detection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Overheat Protection
Does it have overheat protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Automatically reduces or shuts off power when excessive heat is detected.
In the battle of Overheat Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Overheat Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Fire Protection
Does it include fire protection?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
vs
Fire Protection
Fire Protection is included in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, ensuring resistance to fire hazards.
Built-in measures to reduce fire risk during electrical faults.
In the battle of Fire Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fire Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Grounding
Does it support grounding?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Supports grounding to reduce shock and electrical interference.
In the battle of Grounding,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Grounding on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Anti-Spark Protection
Does it have anti-spark protection?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Reduces sparking when plugging or unplugging devices.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Anti-Spark Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
EMI Protection
Is EMI protection included?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Protects against electromagnetic interference affecting nearby electronics.
In the battle of EMI Protection,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
EMI Protection on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Auto Shut-Off
Does it shut off automatically?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Automatically cuts power when unsafe conditions are detected.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Auto Shut-Off on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Safety Certification Level
What is the safety certification level?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Premium
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Premium
Overall strength of safety certifications achieved.
In the battle of Safety Certification Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Safety Certification Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Backward Compatibility is available in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, ensuring they work with older devices.
Maintains compatibility with older charging standards and devices.
In the battle of Backward Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Backward Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Cross-Brand Compatibility is Universal for Anker 735 Nano 2 but Limited for Anker 737 Prime, favoring broader device support in the 735 Nano 2.
Level of compatibility across different device brands.
In the battle of Cross-Brand Compatibility,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
70 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cross-Brand Compatibility on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
USB Power Delivery
Does it support USB Power Delivery?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates support for the USB Power Delivery standard for fast and flexible charging.
In the battle of USB Power Delivery,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
USB Power Delivery on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Quick Charge
Does it support Quick Charge?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates compatibility with Qualcomm Quick Charge technology.
In the battle of Quick Charge,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Quick Charge on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
PPS
Does it support PPS?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Supports Programmable Power Supply for efficient fast charging.
In the battle of PPS,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
PPS on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Wireless Charging Standard
Which wireless charging standard is supported?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Specifies the wireless charging standard supported.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wireless Charging Standard on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Apple Charging
Is it compatible with Apple devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Optimized compatibility with Apple devices and charging requirements.
In the battle of Apple Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Apple Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Android Charging
Is it compatible with Android devices?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Ensures compatibility with Android devices and charging protocols.
In the battle of Android Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Android Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Wearable Charging
Can it charge wearables?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Supports charging of wearables like smartwatches or earbuds.
In the battle of Wearable Charging,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Wearable Charging on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
In the battle of Proprietary Protocol,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
41 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Proprietary Protocol on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
The Thermal Throttling Threshold for Anker 735 Nano 2 is 176 °F, significantly higher than 95 °F in Anker 737 Prime, suggesting better high-temperature performance for the 735 Nano 2.
Temperature at which charging power is reduced to prevent overheating.
In the battle of Thermal Throttling Threshold,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
81.0 °F
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Throttling Threshold on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Loss as Heat is Low for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, supporting energy-efficient operation in each charger.
Percentage of input energy lost as heat during charging.
In the battle of Energy Loss as Heat,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Loss as Heat on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime have Stable Sustained Load Temperature Stability, meaning both manage heat well under continuous use.
Temperature stability during prolonged high-load charging.
In the battle of Sustained Load Temperature Stability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Sustained Load Temperature Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Storage Temperature Range
What is the storage temperature range?
76
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
-4–140°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger can operate within a storage temperature range of -4–140°F (-20–60°C). This wide range facilitates safe storage in diverse environmental conditions without degradation.
Temperature range safe for storing the charger when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Storage Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Internal Cooling Design
What internal cooling design is used?
65
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Heat Sink
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Thermal Pads
Anker 735 Nano 2
Internal cooling is managed by a heat sink, a passive cooling component that absorbs and disperses heat generated during charging to prolong charger lifespan.
Internal structure designed to manage heat.
In the battle of Internal Cooling Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Internal Cooling Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Ambient Temperature Tolerance
How tolerant is it to ambient temperatures?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
Anker 735 Nano 2
High ambient temperature tolerance means the charger can reliably function in warmer environments without risk of overheating or performance degradation.
Ability to perform in varying ambient temperatures.
In the battle of Ambient Temperature Tolerance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
60 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Ambient Temperature Tolerance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Altitude Operating Range
What altitude can it operate at?
5
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Up to 10,000 ft
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
The charger is designed to operate at altitudes up to 10,000 ft (3048 meters), which is beneficial for use in high-altitude locations without performance loss.
Maximum altitude at which the charger operates reliably.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Altitude Operating Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Operating Temperature Range
What is the operating temperature range?
56
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
32–104°F
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
The temperature range within which the charger operates safely.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Operating Temperature Range on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Thermal Dissipation Method
How does it dissipate heat?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Passive
25
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Passive
vs
Thermal Dissipation Method
Thermal Dissipation Method in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime is Passive, indicating similar cooling approaches without active fans.
Method used to release heat during operation.
In the battle of Thermal Dissipation Method,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
30 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Thermal Dissipation Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Fanless Design
Is the charger fanless?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether cooling is achieved without a fan.
In the battle of Fanless Design,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Fanless Design on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Noise Level
How noisy is the charger?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Operational noise produced during charging.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Noise Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
I like that both have straight plug orientation but the 735 Nano 2 covers cable management better with external type while 737 Prime doesn't specify so 735 Nano 2 wins here.
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime are Travel Friendly, supporting ease of use on the go.
Designed for easy transport and use while traveling.
In the battle of Travel Friendly,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Travel Friendly on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Foldable Plug
Does it have a foldable plug?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 735 Nano 2
A foldable plug is featured, making the charger more compact and easier to transport. This design is convenient for travel, reducing the risk of damaging the plug during storage.
Indicates whether the plug can fold for easier storage and travel.
In the battle of Foldable Plug,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Foldable Plug on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Cable Management
How is the cable managed?
55
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
External
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Cable Management
Cable Management is External in Anker 735 Nano 2, but unavailable for Anker 737 Prime, giving a convenience advantage to the 735 Nano 2.
How the charging cable is managed when not in use.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Management on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Indicator Behavior
How do the indicators behave?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
How indicator lights behave during operation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Indicator Behavior on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
User Feedback Method
How does it provide user feedback?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Methods used to communicate status to the user.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
User Feedback Method on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
One-Hand Operation
Can it be operated with one hand?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Allows easy plugging and unplugging with one hand.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
One-Hand Operation on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Setup Complexity
How complex is setup?
75
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Plug-and-Play
85
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Plug‑and‑Play
Effort required to start using the charger.
In the battle of Setup Complexity,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
10 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Setup Complexity on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Maintenance Requirements
Does it require maintenance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
None
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
None
Level of maintenance needed to keep the charger functioning well.
In the battle of Maintenance Requirements,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Maintenance Requirements on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Daily Use Convenience
How convenient is it for daily use?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
vs
Daily Use Convenience
Daily Use Convenience is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, promising user-friendly operation in everyday scenarios.
Overall convenience during everyday use.
In the battle of Daily Use Convenience,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Daily Use Convenience on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Firmware Upgradable
Can the firmware be updated?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates whether the charger firmware can be updated.
In the battle of Firmware Upgradable,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Firmware Upgradable on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Manufacturing Quality Level is Premium in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, reflecting high production standards.
Overall manufacturing quality classification.
In the battle of Manufacturing Quality Level,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Manufacturing Quality Level on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Mean Time Between Failures is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, indicating reliable devices with low failure rates.
Average reliability level indicating how often failures are expected.
In the battle of Mean Time Between Failures,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Mean Time Between Failures on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
How durable is the charging cable under repeated bending?
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Indicates how many bending cycles the charging cable can withstand before performance degradation.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Cable Flex Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Long-Term Stability
How stable is long-term performance?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Stable
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Anker 735 Nano 2
Long-term stability refers to the charger’s ability to maintain consistent performance over extended periods without failure or efficiency loss.
Performance consistency over extended use periods.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Long-Term Stability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Environmental Stress Resistance
How resistant is it to environmental stress?
45
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Medium
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
vs
Environmental Stress Resistance
Environmental Stress Resistance is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, indicating similar resilience to environmental factors.
Ability to withstand heat, humidity, and other stresses.
In the battle of Environmental Stress Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Environmental Stress Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Reliability Certification
Is reliability certified?
Yes
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
Yes
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Anker 737 Prime
The charger holds a reliability certification, indicating adherence to safety and performance standards.
Indicates whether reliability has been independently certified.
In the battle of Reliability Certification,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
1 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Reliability Certification on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Plug Insertion Cycles
How durable is the plug connection over time?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Indicates how many plug-in and unplug cycles the charger connector is designed to withstand before wear affects performance.
In the battle of Plug Insertion Cycles,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Plug Insertion Cycles on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Port Wear Resistance
How resistant are the ports to wear?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
45
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Medium
Resistance of charging ports to wear over time.
In the battle of Port Wear Resistance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
better than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
higher
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Port Wear Resistance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Efficiency Rating is High for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, ensuring effective power use.
Overall classification of how efficiently the charger converts power.
In the battle of Energy Efficiency Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Efficiency Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Carbon Footprint Category is Medium for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, reflecting comparable environmental impact levels.
Estimated environmental impact from production and use.
In the battle of Carbon Footprint Category,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Carbon Footprint Category on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
Who knows?
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
(Help us out by suggesting one!)
vs
Energy Saving Features
Energy Saving Features are available in Anker 735 Nano 2 but not available in Anker 737 Prime, offering slight energy use advantages in the former.
Built-in features designed to reduce energy consumption.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Saving Features on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Eco Mode is not present in either Anker 735 Nano 2 or Anker 737 Prime, so energy-saving automatic modes are absent.
Reduces power consumption when full charging is not required.
In the battle of Eco Mode,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Eco Mode on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Energy Star Compliance
Is it Energy Star compliant?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Indicates compliance with Energy Star efficiency standards.
In the battle of Energy Star Compliance,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Energy Star Compliance on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Standby Efficiency
How efficient is the charger in standby mode?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
High
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
High
Indicates how efficiently the charger uses power while plugged in but not actively charging.
In the battle of Standby Efficiency,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Standby Efficiency on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Power Loss Rating
How much power is lost during operation?
95
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Low
95
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Low
vs
Power Loss Rating
Power Loss Rating is Low in both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime, supporting energy-efficient power conversion.
Indicates the amount of input power lost during conversion and operation.
In the battle of Power Loss Rating,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Power Loss Rating on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Green Materials Usage
Are green materials used?
No
0Votes
Anker 735 Nano 2
No
0Votes
Anker 737 Prime
Uses environmentally friendly or recycled materials.
In the battle of Green Materials Usage,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
same as
Anker 737 Prime ◉
.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Green Materials Usage on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Warranty length is longer on the 737 Prime with 2 years compared to 1.5 years on the 735 Nano 2 so I favor the 737 Prime since longer warranty always helps.
Support Channels for Anker 735 Nano 2 include Email, Chat, and Online Portal, while Anker 737 Prime has limited support online, offering more communication options for the 735 Nano 2.
Ways users can contact customer support.
In the battle of Support Channels,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
7 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Support Channels on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Customer Support Availability
When is customer support available?
15
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Business Hours
35
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Business Hours
vs
Customer Support Availability
Customer Support Availability for both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime is during Business Hours, so support access is limited to these times.
Availability of customer support services.
In the battle of Customer Support Availability,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
20 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Customer Support Availability on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Replacement Policy
What is the replacement policy?
25
Anker 735 Nano 2
0Votes
Standard Returns
75
Anker 737 Prime
0Votes
Standard Returns
vs
Replacement Policy
Both Anker 735 Nano 2 and Anker 737 Prime have a Replacement Policy classified as Standard Returns, ensuring familiar return procedures.
Defines the terms under which a defective or faulty charger can be replaced.
In the battle of Replacement Policy,
Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉ is
worse than
Anker 737 Prime ◉
, delivering
lower
50 score
measurement.
Don’t keep it to yourself — be the first to react and review the
Replacement Policy on Anker 735 Nano 2 ◉
vs Anker 737 Prime ◉ and help others decide!
Surveys
Because hot takes deserve votes.
Charging Speed
How satisfied are you with the charging speed of this chargers when powering everyday devices?
Extremely fast charging — Under 1 hour
0Votes
0Votes
Very fast charging — 1 to 2 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Decent charging speed — 2 to 4 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Slow charging — 4 to 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Very slow charging — Over 6 hours
0Votes
0Votes
Power Output Performance
How well does this chargers provide enough power for phones, tablets, or laptops?
Handles high-demand devices easily — 65 watts or more
0Votes
0Votes
Strong and reliable output — 45 to 64 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Good for most daily devices — 25 to 44 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Limited power capability — 10 to 24 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Very weak power delivery — Under 10 watts
0Votes
0Votes
Durability and Build Quality
How durable does this chargers feel during long-term daily use?
Feels built to last a long time — Over 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Very solid and dependable — 3 to 5 years
0Votes
0Votes
Decently built for regular use — 2 to 3 years
0Votes
0Votes
Feels somewhat fragile — 1 to 2 years
0Votes
0Votes
Breaks down too quickly — Under 1 year
0Votes
0Votes
Portability and Size
How easy is it to carry this chargers for travel or commuting?
Ultra compact and pocketable — Under 3 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Light and travel friendly — 3 to 5 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Moderately easy to carry — 5 to 7 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat bulky — 7 to 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heavy and inconvenient — Over 10 ounces
0Votes
0Votes
Heat Management
How well does this chargers control heat during extended charging sessions?
Stays cool even under heavy use — Under 90 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Gets slightly warm — 90 to 100 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Noticeably warm to the touch — 100 to 110 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Runs quite hot — 110 to 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Uncomfortably hot — Over 120 degrees Fahrenheit
0Votes
0Votes
Ease of Use
How easy is it to use this chargers on a daily basis?
Effortless and intuitive — No learning needed
0Votes
0Votes
Very easy to understand — Minimal effort
0Votes
0Votes
Takes a little getting used to — Some adjustment
0Votes
0Votes
Slightly confusing at times — Requires patience
0Votes
0Votes
Frustrating to use — Feels complicated
0Votes
0Votes
Setup Experience
How smooth is the initial setup experience with this chargers?
Instantly ready to use — Plug and charge
0Votes
0Votes
Quick and simple setup — Less than 1 minute
0Votes
0Votes
Setup takes some attention — A few minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels awkward — Several minutes
0Votes
0Votes
Setup feels annoying — Too many steps
0Votes
0Votes
Design and Visual Appeal
How attractive does the design of this chargers look in everyday environments?
Sleek and modern look — Feels premium
0Votes
0Votes
Clean and stylish design — Looks nice
0Votes
0Votes
Simple and acceptable — Nothing special
0Votes
0Votes
Somewhat unattractive — Feels dated
0Votes
0Votes
Cheap-looking design — Not appealing
0Votes
0Votes
Noise and Comfort
How comfortable is this chargers to use in quiet environments?
Completely silent operation — No noise at all
0Votes
0Votes
Almost silent — Barely noticeable
0Votes
0Votes
Occasionally noticeable — Slight sound
0Votes
0Votes
Clearly noticeable noise — Can be distracting
0Votes
0Votes
Annoyingly loud — Very disruptive
0Votes
0Votes
Pricing and Value
How do you feel about the price of this chargers compared to what it offers?
Recaptor
0
Cartling
